|
Post by Moose on Feb 18, 2013 16:31:02 GMT
ah no prospect of peeeking then
|
|
|
Post by Miisa on Feb 18, 2013 19:06:38 GMT
Well, the male admins can always change the settings temporarily, or perhaps it asks non-authorised admins if they want to enter with admin privileges, but I doubt they could accidentally wander in.
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 18, 2013 20:40:28 GMT
*looks happy*
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Feb 18, 2013 21:00:42 GMT
I was at a show at Olympia in London once, and wandered into the ladies' toilets... I knew there was something wrong straight away... it all seemed oddly cleaner and nicer than I would have expected!
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 18, 2013 23:27:47 GMT
... but I doubt they could accidentally wander in. *feels happy*
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 19, 2013 19:31:20 GMT
Friends and I used to use the men's toilets in nightclubs sometimes, if the queue for the ladies was too long.
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Feb 19, 2013 20:54:51 GMT
I am assuming you mean the stalls and not the urinals?!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2013 8:34:22 GMT
I once had to go to the men's toilet in a bar because the ladie's toilet was flooded. it was disgusting!
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 20, 2013 12:52:57 GMT
I think part of that is because pub landlords consider the cleanliness in the Ladies to be more important. The Ladies' toilet in the Navigation in Marple is much nicer, and more likely to be kept clean, than the Men's toilet. (I only know that because we had to use the Ladies for brief period one day.) There is a feeling that men don't need a smart toilet.
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 20, 2013 20:26:54 GMT
Stalls not urinals yes. Urinals are disgusting things
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Feb 20, 2013 22:25:11 GMT
Urinals are the primary reason there is almost no queue compared to the ladies' toilet. Some types are better than others... I've never been very keen on the ones that are basically a wall to urinate against, with a trough along the bottom to the drain.
|
|
|
Post by ceptimus on Feb 20, 2013 23:58:05 GMT
There used to be some bars in Australia where the bar was also a urinal. It meant that the (all male I assume) customers didn't have to waste valuable drinking time by walking to the toilets.
I don't know if any of them still exist. I guess not.
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 21, 2013 1:20:57 GMT
That's... that's .. words fail me
|
|
|
Post by Kye on Feb 21, 2013 3:34:22 GMT
Ew!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2013 7:59:58 GMT
In Berlin, there is a bar called "Das Klo" (the toilet) where the glasses look like little toilets. But even there, people have to go to a proper toilet.
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Feb 21, 2013 8:57:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 21, 2013 18:34:58 GMT
lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2013 11:29:56 GMT
Eww!
|
|
bill
Senior members
Posts: 891
|
Post by bill on Feb 22, 2013 21:59:34 GMT
Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 22, 2013 22:11:57 GMT
nothing wrong with Aussie lager!
|
|
|
Post by Shake on Feb 27, 2013 4:21:16 GMT
Why is there not an option for 'both'?
But yes, I ate some dark chocolate on the way into work, so I opted for sex also.
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Feb 27, 2013 20:59:25 GMT
...on the way into work?
|
|
|
Post by Shake on Feb 28, 2013 15:58:10 GMT
...on the way into work? Heh heh ... no. I'm not even sure how that would have worked.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Feb 28, 2013 16:20:52 GMT
Heh heh ... no. I'm not even sure how that would have worked. I've eaten chocolate on the way to work before now
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Feb 28, 2013 19:28:01 GMT
Not me. I don't eat that much chocolate. Prolly would be better if I did cos my vices are rather more fattening and harmful
|
|