|
Post by Moose on Jul 12, 2013 16:34:24 GMT
When this Royal baby will be born *tosses a pound coin and a cat into a pot*
my money is on Tuesday at four fifty two am
|
|
bill
Senior members
Posts: 891
|
Post by bill on Jul 12, 2013 16:42:10 GMT
Oh let's not. :-(
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Jul 12, 2013 16:54:57 GMT
Spoil sport! Come on let's have your bet.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 12, 2013 16:58:41 GMT
Which royal baby? Is there one due?
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Jul 12, 2013 16:59:40 GMT
The Queen and Prince Philip. Rumour has it that donor eggs were used.
|
|
|
Post by Mari on Jul 12, 2013 17:20:08 GMT
Is it due anytime soon then?
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Jul 12, 2013 17:43:06 GMT
tomorrow I believe.
|
|
|
Post by Mari on Jul 12, 2013 19:02:50 GMT
First babies are hardly ever on time. I'd say we can wait a couple more days for this one to arrive.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 12, 2013 19:12:52 GMT
Whatever.
|
|
|
Post by ProdigalAlan on Jul 12, 2013 19:30:19 GMT
What ?? Andy Murray's having a baby .
|
|
|
Post by JoeP on Jul 12, 2013 20:17:35 GMT
I don't see the poll.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 12, 2013 21:02:53 GMT
I think it will be this month.
|
|
|
Post by Kye on Jul 12, 2013 21:27:54 GMT
Maybe my birthday --the 21st.
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Jul 12, 2013 21:36:42 GMT
It's not a poll! It's a sweepstake!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2013 21:57:30 GMT
Sunday at 3:30 p.m. Don't know why, it just sounds good.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 12, 2013 22:16:34 GMT
OK then, Monday at 11:00am.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2013 22:20:06 GMT
That's getting interesting. Do I still win if the baby arrices on Sunday at 3:34?
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 12, 2013 22:21:41 GMT
Yes, it should be the nearest in time.
|
|
|
Post by Sarah W. on Jul 13, 2013 4:23:44 GMT
Monday, 1:30 am.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 13, 2013 9:37:58 GMT
Apparently, the due date is guesswork by the media based on when Kate stopped he official engagements. So it could be anytime in the next few weeks.
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Jul 13, 2013 10:13:07 GMT
They also probably don't want to risk her waters breaking while visiting somewhere, either!
|
|
|
Post by Moose on Jul 13, 2013 15:43:56 GMT
Naw, as her pregnancy was announced before Christmas and she must have been at least six weeks gone now then realistically she must be about to pop
|
|
|
Post by Shake on Jul 13, 2013 18:50:54 GMT
Naw, as her pregnancy was announced before Christmas and she must have been at least six weeks gone now then realistically she must be about to pop This sounds reasonable. I was 10 days early, according to my mother. Tray was 12 days early.
|
|
|
Post by Kye on Jul 13, 2013 19:49:15 GMT
All three of my kids were early --about 2 weeks.
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 13, 2013 23:51:01 GMT
Richard was 10 weeks early.
|
|
|
Post by Kye on Jul 14, 2013 0:22:47 GMT
That's early!
|
|
|
Post by Miisa on Jul 14, 2013 7:40:58 GMT
Inside of two weeks before or after the "due date" are all on time. We know little more than that the due date is in July.
But my bet: 17.7 at 10 pm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2013 8:02:13 GMT
Richard was 10 weeks early. Wow, was he ok?
|
|
|
Post by tangent on Jul 14, 2013 9:36:54 GMT
It was very risky in the 70s, when he was born, especially being a boy. He was in an incubator for ten weeks and came out of hospital around the time he should have been born.
|
|
|
Post by Alvamiga on Jul 14, 2013 10:09:54 GMT
I required a blood transfusion when I was born due to something to do with having a differing blood group from my mother. I think I was fine when I was connected to her as her systems were dealing with whatever was in the blood stream, but my own system could not deal with it. Medical science is responsible for my existence. You only have them to blame!
|
|